 |
| It's the small pieces they couldn't find in 1947.. |
A lot of recent evidence points to Roswell having been exactly what was described in the first news accounts way back when.
The UFO Museum put up the money, and the results were back in five days. Kimbler says he almost fell over when he saw the information. The ratios were off, and as he puts it there were only two answers to explain the results, “either the lab made an analytical error or the material is not from Earth.”And you can also read what Anthony Bragalia has been up to over at The Bragalia Files. It's all very interesting and suggestive that there's much more to the story.
I had no deep interest in UFOs and aliens. I read about it along with everything else I read about, but it wasn't a main point of interest. Then one day last year, my son and I watched a very strange looking craft hover very low over our neighborhood, and then smoothly accelerate to nothing in less than 8 seconds. It was huge, and it was fast. If my son hadn't seen it, I'd have thought I had simply hallucinated It was broad daylight and it hung so obviously in the sky. Why didn't anyone else see it?
That's a mystery. But however that works out, do not forget that if UFOs of alien origen exist, they have always existed. Your life does not change one bit.
Well I hadnt heard a word about this... after I read your post and looked at the links- and they are fascinating- I did a little more looking into this discovery. Above Top Secret carries a 'dialogue' with Frank himself here-
ReplyDeletehttp://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread728111/pg7
- it may be in the middle of the thread.
His dialogue casts a different light on the whole thing than the article on Open Minds. And I listened to some of the interview as well...
Really more tests need to be done. And the idea of isotope ratios excluding the possibility the sample(s) are from Earth may need clarification.
The graph in the article is striking but perhaps a wee bit deceptive at the same time. Again I would refer you to his comments on Above Top Secret.
Why is it that so-called 'proof' seems so slippery..? We have all sorts of things- photos etc.- clearly something is going on. But nuts and bolts, a 'shard' of a saucer, that book Betty Hill wanted to take with her, the absolutely convincing stuff we dont quite have.
That is, after all this time, kind of interesting.
"Your life does not change one bit." There is a deep truth in that. Yet at least there is some perspective about your life that may change.
Copernicus changed things a little bit. Still beyond all that, the theories that come and go, life in the here and now isn't that far away. Being here is always the challenge.
Thanks for the pointer to the new info. As usual, something oversold..
ReplyDeleteYou wrote:
"Why is it that so-called 'proof' seems so slippery..? We have all sorts of things- photos etc.- clearly something is going on. But nuts and bolts, a 'shard' of a saucer, that book Betty Hill wanted to take with her, the absolutely convincing stuff we dont quite have.
That is, after all this time, kind of interesting. "
Indeed! I made much the same comment about bigfootery some time ago. It seems the "proof" will always leave you to your own free will to believe or disbelieve as you like.
That always strikes me as conforming to a "spiritual" profile -- which things that we know are real do not. The wrench does not require you to make a leap of faith in its reality, it's just there on the workbench.
This is the part that needs the most investigating. I believe it implies that the universe has a deep spiritual component, but then I have had experiences that make me think so too.
The whole idea of proof takes us down another path entirely. That notion underwent some evolution in various disciplines of mathematics. It is no longer the 'simple' thing it might have seemed a century or two ago. I am not sure if its formulation there would help us here but it could be interesting to bring the two together.
ReplyDeleteAnd I cant help thinking of the phrase from the Bible:
Now faith is the substance of things hoped for, the evidence of things not seen.
And also that statement from Coleridge about receiving a flower in a dream after a stroll through paradise only to realize upon awakening the flower was still in his hand!
We have a certain expectation(s) that these 'intrusions' into our life seem never to quite fulfill.
Yet not only does it not lessen their impact on our lives but rather often seems to magnify that impact.
As if not having 'proof' is yet a strange species of proof in itself.
Without a doubt the photographs, memories, etc. are a form of 'proof', a species of it so to speak.
What is it we are really asking for..? To have something like the wrench, on the workbench, not requiring a leap of faith..? Still even at some level that wrench requires a wee bit of faith.
If somebody hits you over the head with a wrench, if you deny its reality, the impact is there just the same.
Well strangely enough these experiences with this 'dream world', even if we deny their reality, they have an impact on our lives just the same too.
The notion of proof exists on many levels. Without a doubt there is a reason this 'dream world' refuses to fulfill our expectations and desires. Maybe it cant... but I suspect often it can but doesn't.
I also suspect that beyond our ordinary idea of 'proof', or faith, or hope, lies a substratum, and that world often provides us plenty to convince that substratum, convincing us in the end the whole thing has been more than just a bargain, but we wouldn't trade the experience, as deficient in certain ways as it is, for anything.
Withholding a 'wrench-like' reality from us is perhaps a strategy meant to lead us to something other than where we are at...
You know this debris from Roswell does seem quite oversold... it wont surprise me to find it leads nowhere... or to but another question.