Thursday, January 13, 2011

The fall of the house of Blogsquatcher

Ye olde logo

People still ask me why I closed up the Blogsquatcher site -- well gather 'round, friends, for I am fixin' to tell y'all exactly why I did it.

There were many reasons before the Spring of 2010 that I had been contemplating quitting the gig, and I'll list these briefly here, though none of them were the actual reason I closed up shop.  First, keeping that blog was a job and I couldn't make myself stop doing it.  It was a lot more work than you'd think.  For instance, taking an interview and transcribing it often took more than twelve hours of drudge work.  And, friends, I should not have to tell you by now how I hate work..  But once I had started that process, I felt obliged to keep at it.  Turning up the bigfoot news every day took quite a bit of trawling and foraging, too, far beyond the lazy go-where-I-want-to-go browsing I ordinarily do.  None of that is something that you'd wake up and do if you didn't think it was your job.  Yet, as a job, the gig payed very poorly.  As in, absolutely zilch!

A teeny tiny picture of the blog in action.

I had other interests, too, that had to lapse so long as I kept up an active life in the field of bigfootery.  After five years of this, it began to really drag on me.  Remember, I'm a recovering narcissist, so deep down, I think this sort of arrangement is just plain wrong.  But I also believed in the idea of service to others who shared my interests, but not my ability to dig into it.  Until the end, the idea of service won out.  (Take that, narcissism!)

Secondly, the field of sasquatchery, in what might be thought of as its "upper echelon" is full of idiots, cranks, bunglers, SOBs, biyatches, self-aggrandizing pricks -- I could go on, but you get the picture.  The number of people who do not fall into this category could be counted with your fingers and toes.  Fingers and toes, people!  There are thousands of interested folk who do not aspire to the "upper echelon" and most of these are ordinary folk who do not deserve such appellations, and my list is not meant to cast any aspersions upon them.  But on the whole, the "big fish, little pond" of bigfootery is an asshole magnet.  It was downright unpleasant to deal with many of these folk day in and day out.  The conniving douchebaggery in the field was staggering.  If I even attempted to describe to you some of the things that went on, you would not believe me.

Thirdly, the fact that I was involved in bigfoot research was always likely to be an embarrassment to my family if people at their places of employment ever found out.  "Your husband looks for bigfoot?  Why, that must mean you are an idiot since you married him!"  That was one big fear.  So I tried to keep my identity on the down-low.  Some people, however, knew who I was and seemingly delighted in using my name in print, when I had said all along, I don't mind anyone knowing who I am, just don't put it in print.

You'd be amazed how many times you can find "blogsquatcher" and "dbdonlon" right next to each other on certain websites..

Not that it matters, but the narcissist in me seems to believe people should just know how I want to be represented.

Artist's conception of dbdonlon.

But enough of that, let's get to the real reason.  Because it'll really freak you out, man..

In April of last year, I was working on finishing a book I thought I'd title Living Anomaly.  In this book I wanted to go over all the anomalies that appear in bigfoot research, but that had been played down since the end of the 1970s.  I could see that there was a public image of bigfoot that mainstream bigfoot "experts" wanted to convey -- that it was an ordinary creature that lived in certain areas.  But inside the bigfoot world, I could see that most researchers knew a few things that played against that desired public image.

For one thing, bigfoot did not appear to live anywhere.  In other words, there were no locations where the ecological impact of such a large creature in the numbers it would have to have to sustain a population could be detected.  You might find a lone feeding site, a lone bedding site, and maybe a spot where something large had defecated, but the trail would end there.  There would be no further impact to be found on the local ecology.

Indeed there are exceptions to this particular rule -- sometimes a spot is found where a longer habitation seems to have occurred, but even there, you won't find the impact of any quantity of sasquatches, just seemingly that one fellow.

It was like bigfoot came for a little vacation, and went on its way.

Add to this the many stories of bigfoot that included other strange details.  If you followed the Blogsquatcher blog, you know about these now.  There were associations with UFOs, paranormal effects, telepathic communication -- the kind of stuff that only "kooks" believe, you know?

When I got involved in bigfoot research, this had been played down to the extent that it was hard to find the references to it anymore.  You could go back to the 70s and find loads of it, but these references were not placed in any prominence in the current milieu.  You had to go looking for it.  This was one reason why I thought it would be hard to find these kinds of cases in support of a book, so that I really thought it wouldn't be an easy write.  But when I went looking, I was amazed at what I found.  So amazed that I couldn't sit on it.  I blogged it baby.  I blogged the sheiza out of it.  This was in the period between say October of 2009 and April of 2010.

As I went along, I thought to myself, there are a few things I haven't touched on, like "Is bigfoot a demon?"  Because there weren't many stories like that.  But no sooner had I thought it, than I got a phone call and an email that made me sit up and take notice.

The phone call, which morphed into an interview I did with a witness who declared that he knew bigfoot to be a demon, ultimately turned out to be a hoax.  But it was a strange hoax to my mind.

 But first the email.  Shortly after posting the story "When bigfoot gets in your head -- telepathy, dreams and channelers, oh my!" I got an email from someone who could do what we call channeling.  I have always been suspicious of channeling for the simple reason that nobody seems to have ever been able to prove where the channeled information ultimately comes from.  So many times one finds that what is channeled is actually complete bunk, but it captures the attention and keeps one involved while it's going on.  This always seemed like a kind of "honey trap" to me.  You couldn't tell what the ultimate goal was, but it surely wasn't about giving accurate information.

Anyway, this channeler offered to link me up with the bigfoot I had, apparently, been near in Pennsylvania in 2005 or so.  I thought, well, why not?  It might be good for the book.

Now, two things happened during this event that shook me a bit.  The first is that the channeled bigfoot knew things, intimate things about me that the channeler could not have known.  I don't think the channeler could tell you today what that was, because I have never revealed it, and it wouldn't be obvious simply by looking at the transcript.  But the bigfoot had said, seemingly in passing, something that I had thought about for the first time ever earlier that day.  A simple coincidence?  Maybe.  Call me crazy, but I thought that perhaps this was an attempt to show me that this was "legit" in a way only I would be able to recognize.

OK, so there's that.  Creepy, but on its own, not much to go on.  However, during the "conversation" with this bigfoot personage, an offer was made.  Here's a quote from that email:
Put aside for a week, a day, the proving of us and just be with us... ok.. we/I will show you understanding of ways to be with us... it will take you further from the proving things... but you can still play the game... we do want you to be a good researcher and we may in time give you evidence but never to prove it ... but to make you BIG... we do like you... no so much some of them... really.... 
To me, this seems a pretty blatant quid pro quo offer -- if you come into our world, we'll give you some evidence, not to prove it mind you, but to make you a big shot in bigfootery.  I mentioned this to the channeler, and this is what came back:
ok, he says, not BIG but deep, in knowing and understanding...  and being with... and you may be asked to bring forth evidence... yes, asked... ( now I have chills , yikes )

WE WILL CHOOSE WHO BRINGS EVIDENCE... WE WILL CHOOSE WHEN AND WE WILL CHOOSE HOW AND WHO.... 
That started to look creepy to me.  I continued to write back and forth with the channeler in a cordial way, because I'm normally pretty cordial anyway, but I was seriously getting creeped out by this.  I mentioned this in my next email back to the channeler:
One thing for me is, I had something like a near-death experience (which is why my perspective is so different from most bigfoot researchers) and that has brought me into a knowing state, rather than a believing or faith state, about God.  God has been very kind to me all my life, even when I was not being so good.  I would not want to get involved with something that is unknown to us, without knowing for certain that it doesn't bother God.  Now, usually, all I have to do is ask and I get a very clear answer in a dream.  I can always tell a God dream because the answer is simple, elegant, and deep.  I also get dreams from energies who want me to do things I should not do.  I feel that I have to be able to distinguish these energies, and I'm getting better at it, maybe.  But until I thought I got a green light from God, I would not want to do something like this.
It's partly because I thought bigfoot might be an animal, or primitive man being, in other words, wholly physical, that I got involved.  As I've grown to understand that it is some kind of spiritual energy, I've drawn back because I don't know the source of that energy.  I don't get answers when I ask about whether it's alright.  This leads me to believe this is a test for me, and I'm not quite sure how I come down on it.
Of course, I realize that my experiences might have led me to hold beliefs that really aren't true.  I try to reality test things..  I get the strong impression that what you are passing on to me is actually from the source of my dream in the PA woods, which I am glad of.  And he sounds like a nice fellow, but as Shakespeare put it, "a man can smile and smile and be a devil still"..
After this exchange, I did that thing where you ask for a dream.  (I do this quite often anyway.)  This is what I got:


February 22, 2010 
My memory of it begins with me looking at a dark haired, dour looking man who is sitting at a table in a hotel conference room that had been set up for a seminar.  I know that he is a bad guy, and that I have seen him before.  He is out to get someone that I know, who does not know about the danger.  So I watch the dark haired man wrap a poison bomb in his tablecloth, right at the edge, and somehow attach it there.  His purpose is to poison this other fellow (who is male, but not anyone I really know).  I went out and told the other fellow where he put the bomb, and he decided not to go to the seminar.
(As I think about it now, it seems to me that spreading words or “evidence” that were false and led to bad conclusions would be a sort of “poison bomb” from a certain point of view.)
Since my companion didn’t go into the conference room, the man came outside where we were at that time. We saw him first and tackled him.  He fell into a ditch, and coincidentally, the bomb landed right below him so that his mouth was on it.  Later I was in a store with the other fellow, and I did something to the man (I guess this was psychically) to make him unable to speak.  I told my companion about it.  Then I looked out the window and saw that we were up several stories in the air.  Down below, in an alley, were many boxes and several trucks scattered about.  I thought that this was good, because now no one would be able to discover what we’d done.  (I don’t remember why this would have made sense at the time.)  I felt as if we had to be clandestine about what we had done, even though the man was going to use a poison bomb.
Then I went down (?) and saw another person that I knew (and knew to be a bad sort) who was working on a device that would cause people’s shopping carts (?) to go much slower than they should, which he was going to use at a time when people were having to flee for their lives.  I went through the store nervous that I would be discovered.  I saw a group of people that I knew in the middle of the store, talking about a test that they were taking.  I tossed something to one of them, but saw that it was damaged by the toss.  I apologized to the person.  He asked me if I thought any Jets were going to win.  I was confused, because I knew that the Saints had won the Superbowl and the season was over.  But then I realized that he meant in a basketball tournament, where some Jets players were playing for different basketball teams.  I said I supposed that they could if they were on the right team.  I went to my hotel room at this point and turned on the TV to see the tournament, and saw that it had only recently started.
What the.. is the first thing you'd say.  This is a rather dense dream, and I'm not going to unpack it all now.  But the first thing I thought, as I mentioned in the text, was that the "poison bomb" was what had been offered to me.  I mentioned this in my next email:
I think the poison bomb possibly relates to a lie that would be broadcast, as in poison = lie, bomb = spreading it all around.  I take it to mean that our bigfoot friend's offer to make me "BIG" by giving me some evidence to share was an effort to deceive not just me but all kinds of people, since I would have put it on my blog and lots of people trust me.
This was about the end of the line as far as the channeler went, as that person continued to see things in a positive light, while I thought the dream details were pointing fairly clearly to the negative.  I was considering all of this, and how to approach it in the future.  Is there some kind of deception involved in bigfoot research?

At this time I was also reading plenty of strange tales about cryptoterrestrials too, as Mac Tonnies' book had just come out, so such things were in the air, and it was all coming together at me rather quickly.  I conceived that unless one actually sees a bigfoot, which does happen but not so often during what we call "expeditions," when what happens are usually a congruence of strange sounds, branch breaking, and other indications that something is there, but you really cannot say what -- anyway, unless you actually saw one yourself, you would not get enough evidence to show that they existed.  You'd simply have to believe on the basis of the word of others, backed up by the kind of weak evidence that you do find.

This is believing on faith.  This is religion.

It was while I was going over all of this I got that phone call about bigfoot being a demon.  I recorded the call, but when nothing checked out when I tried to verify what was verifiable in his tale, I decided not to transcribe it and run it.  But at that time I also got a strange email titled "That's a demon."

I couldn't make heads or tails of that email.  It seemed to be talking about a video, but I hadn't put up any videos recently.  I wrote back to the fellow asking for clarification, but my email bounced immediately.  This puzzled me so much that I examined the first email more closely.  It turned out the email had been sent in June of 2009, but I had never received it until March of 2010.

A strange synchronicity, no?  As it happens, this sort of thing had happened to me before.  At one time I involved myself in a certain kind of divination, known as dowsing.  It turned out that I was pretty good at it, which I found shocking.  I wondered what the meaning of this was and whether dowsing was something safe to do.  I got several dreams that suggested that, no, it wasn't.  But I kept at it, trying to be safe, whatever that means.. and then I got an email from nobody that said something about demons and dowsing.  I didn't keep that email, but it was downright strange -- it had no information in the "from" file, and was only a title with no text.  It had been mailed to me, so it didn't appear to be a mass spam mailing.

And it came directly after I asked something like, "Gee, if I have a guardian angel and this sort of thing isn't good to do, how about giving me a sign?"

So I wrote that piece on bigfoot as demon with all this in my mind.  And I started looking back at my own history in bigfootery, and I noticed a kind of strange pattern.

My favorite bigfoot story, because it is so near where I live now and where I lived in my youth, is the Mount Vernon Monster story.  As it happened, the fellow who said bigfoot was a demon claimed to have seen the Mount Vernon Monster, and this was the one that convinced him it was a demon.

OK, so far that's just coincidence, or perhaps he designed it that way since it was a hoax.  But as I thought about it, I realized, every time I had been about to quit bigfooting, I got a new bit of information about the Mount Vernon Monster.

I can go back through my files and find them, and see that they came during times when I was really considering hanging it all up.

And then after I finally did quit, guess what I got?  Yep, another bit of information about the Mount Vernon Monster.

So you see, the idea that I had that I was being manipulated had quite a few bits of information backing it up.

I could see the manipulation after the fact, but I could not see what the purpose of it was.  And since, as I said in an email above, people tended to trust me, I could not in good conscience continue while I knew that I was subject to this manipulation.  I didn't know what it was that I was giving you, dear readers.  Perhaps it was the "poison bomb" from the dream?

So I wrote this post to let everyone know I was quitting, and why:

INTO THE SUNSET
There comes a time when all things must change, when our interests transform, and our needs become different.  That time has come for me in respect to this blog.  I have enjoyed the journey that this blog represents, but my friends, I must tell you, it is done. 
In fact, I am now retired from looking for bigfoot in any capacity from here out.  For me, bigfoot has become not less of a mystery since I started looking into it in 2004, but much, much more mysterious.  I despair of actually ever discovering what lies at the bottom of the matter.
But whether or not that is the case, I have exhausted the energy I have to spend upon it.
I leave you with this last thought -- if, as it seems to me, there is something deliberately deceptive about the bigfoot phenomenon, there always remains the possibility that your best interests are not taken into account when you participate in it.
If I look at a squirrel outside my window right now, I am sure that what I'm observing is a squirrel.  I am confident that I am not deceived.  But if I look at a bigfoot, or any other mystery humanoid, I do not know what I am looking at.  Indeed, I am sure that I am being deceived in some way.  It is my intention not to participate in that deception any further, for I recognize that by blogging about it, I am fostering that deception, even if it isn't my wish.
I do not desire to be used by something when I am completely ignorant of the motives, or even the essence of what I'm being used by.
I do not know that investigating bigfoot or other mystery creatures is a harmful exercise, it's just that I don't want to wander around blindly, not knowing who or what I am bumping into, or stepping on (or what I am stepping in!) in a karmic sense.
So there it is, all spelled out, dear readers.  It may seem quite peculiar, even deranged, to many of you. But this was my state of mind, and the events that formed it, at the time I called it quits.

I still don't know what lies at the bottom of the bigfoot phenomenon, but I continue to be of the opinion that there is a deception going on.  So if you want to follow such things, do be careful.

17 comments:

  1. Thank you, "blogsquatcher/dbdonlon" for sharing your insights and background for why you left the field. So many people come into and leave the study of Sasquatch, it is a shame that more treatments like this do not appear.

    You were always a thoughtful commentator within hominology, and I appreciated your words and thoughts.

    You are missed.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I echo Loren's comments. I understand your rational and can appreciate your reasoning which may or may not be correct. However, you've contributed to our field and will always be remembered in a positive way. Thank you for sharing so much of your time with us and God Bless,

    LL

    ReplyDelete
  3. i could tell when the seatide shifted on your site, and i applauded you when you started asking questions about the paranormal aspects of bigfoot. i think it's not a coincidence that you stopped blogging the closer you got. that's how it seems to happen so often in the study of these hidden things. the great people leave.
    i think you wanted to prove it was a flesh and blood animal, and that's why you seriously researched and wrote about the low sound frequencies. And the reason you wanted to prove it is the same reason you threw away the "Bigfoot" book when you got to the story from Greensburg. You knew then, intuitively, that this was not an animal. This IS a demon, but not in the christian way, rather a diamon in both senses of that word... a divinity or supernatural being of a nature between gods and humans and an inner or attendant spirit or inspiring force. It is living and moves at a different speed. sometimes it is within our ability to see it. Humans are not "less than" this phenomenon, and there are ways to protect yourself and exercise more control over the experience. I think the "we will choose" is blatant bullying. Humans cannot however prove this by camera traps and call blasting. this entity can be summoned but it is not (emotionally) healthy to be too preoccupied with it. which can happen. so time off is great! but why not reconsider your book or reposting your blog as an archive? your thoughts and experiences are important. i was really disappointed when i found out you had deleted your posts from the wayback machine.
    best of luck, blogsquatcher!

    ReplyDelete
  4. Thank you for sharing and explaining, and very glad you are back. And I apologize profusely for being one of the morons, even though it was innocent (or sloppy) on my part, who used your name alongside "blogsquatcher." I do my best to always respect people's requests for confidentiality. I hope you accept my apology for being dense. Glad you are back. What an exciting and interesting article!

    ReplyDelete
  5. Thanks for all your kind remarks. I really appreciate them.

    Regan, you are not a Moron!

    I want to emphasize that I *don't* feel as if I know what lies at the bottom of the mystery. A lot of demon stuff was thrown around at the end, but I was obviously being manipulated. Was that just "disinformation"? I couldn't tell. But that's why I can't keep going into it. I realized that I had been manipulated in the past, and probably would be in the future, by something that probably was smarter than it was letting on.

    I probably should have mentioned in the text about how often it happens that a researcher goes to a location and something happens, seemingly by coincidence, while the researcher is there.

    This kind of thing is not so rare. If you look for it in books written by researchers, you'll start to notice it's a pattern.

    Maybe I should make a post about that in the future. But I think the manipulating goes way back.

    So as I said at the end of the post, do be careful friends. I don't think we have any idea what we are up against.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Thanks for the explanation, Blogsquatcher. The void you left when you shuttered the blog remains unfilled. I'll echo the suggestion/request that you leave the old posts up. They bear re-reading. I'd love to read that book, too, if you ever feel like getting it out there.

    ReplyDelete
  7. DB,

    You know almost better then anyone I can't stop now. I don't care what Bigfoot is. Running away for 25 years did me no good, but so far neither has being involved. I do miss you though. Be safe and be well.

    JC

    ReplyDelete
  8. It's a high wire act, isn't it? To compound things further we live in a culture that does not largely tolerate uncertainty, or ambivalence when it comes to whatever is observed, whether it is prosaic or paranormal, and so to position yourself as open to uncertainty, well from my own experiences, they can lead to any number of suggestions from anonymous origins, which often have an uncanny ability to mimic our most deeply embedded yet subconscious desires. The high wire act requires a presence of mind also to neither discount or attract them, and keep writing, keep communicating your expressions. You as far as I can tell, have done all of the above and I am in your camp. By the way, I located the gentleman we discussed some time ago who is now, a wildlife photographer and accomplished classical guitarist. E mail me if you want to pursue this. Otherwise, the best of luck to you and to all of us at the borderlines.
    Bruce

    ReplyDelete
  9. Thank you for addressing the paranormal aspects of this phenomena. But mostly, thanks for all the insight.

    ReplyDelete
  10. There is a time and place for every revelation in life, most often not in most people's lifetime who are seeking the answers. Definitely, there are elements to sasquatch that many choose to keep out of sight, out of mind. Elements that simply don't fit with the expectations we have. The 'scientific' pursuit has never been able to explain every mystery, but science won't yield its superiority to the unexplained either. But maybe that's why mainstream science & physicists developed theories of alternate dimensions as a possible means of solving some of these perplexing mysteries of mankind? Unfortunately science can't put its finger on something that can't be dissected, and so far, sasquatch has shown itself to be very competent at avoiding that fate. Many strange reports about bigfoot from competent people defy reason. However instead of science accepting the word of these reliable witnesses, it is often easier for science to discard the validity of their claims as being of a 'fringe' group. This is what frustrates many who have come to recognize that these beings may be something more then we expect, or hope. The 'fringe' theories about what they may be, are just more then the rest can even discuss rationally. Its too much to swallow.

    I too feel that it is important for every researcher to keep in the back of their mind that maybe what we are dealing with, isn't quite what we want them to be. I keep an open mind and don't close out my options just because of some status quo paradigm authorization from Bigfoot Research Worldwide et al. Unfortunately the risk to many researchers out there is that they don't know how to manage their obsession, nor do they allow their spiritual self to guide them when its most important. That isn't the case with everyone, but many don't even recognize the diving board they are stepped out on. Ironically this particular mystery draws a certain number of naive souls who don't understand the risks as they devote themselves to 'solving' the mystery. Is it a mere coincidence that discussing spiritual elements and God, that is so important to the majority in daily life, is seen as a taboo in bigfooting? Is the forbiddance of involving God in the bigfoot field simply revealing one of the tools/methods of the deception of which you speak? They are clearly of an intelligence we are incapable of outsmarting. They also have a way of getting inside some people's heads. Smart people would allow themselves the means to at least protect their soul as they proceed with caution.

    OR, they are just some DAMNED DIRTY APE we can't catch! :) But I don't think so...

    ReplyDelete
  11. Hi DB...I believe many of your thoughts on the existence of Bigfoot mirror several of mine. Your explanation was quite telling and understandable. Take care and best of luck...

    ReplyDelete
  12. Robert Bolton (1572 – 1631) was an English clergyman and academic, noted as a preacher. Bolton writes that "ignoring the 'empty' aspect of the soul-life is by no means immediately evident, but it inevitably leads to relations with alien wills and forces in which one's own will has less and less relevance."

    ReplyDelete
  13. I completely understand where you're coming from. I know from personal experience that investigating/researching Fortean phenomena can take a heavy toll. My own pursuits have almost cost me my marriage, my family, maybe my life. And that's not even mentioning the financial toll. Many times I've taken a break, left the field, taken my ball and gone home. Sometimes you just gotta step back, get re-balanced.
    I'm grateful for your contributions to the field. If you ever chose to return, I'll be glad. If not, I completely understand.
    Best!
    G

    ReplyDelete
  14. it would seem that you became so engrossed in your subject , that it became a part of your life even towards your subconscious mind. Someone who new your Blog but probably never cared for it possibly someone near, deliberately egged you on to continue to write about this subject.
    Strange the e mails from the past, you would think that perhaps someone had used a computer with the date wrong, however the internet doesn't allow for wrong time and dates for access.
    I didn't know your blog as I just came across the story from a fellow blogger and since I have only blogged a short while I can understand your need to continue to write for your followers, ultimately you feel compelled...find something new for yourself..John

    ReplyDelete
  15. DBdonlan,

    I loved this post - and thru the UFO crappola - can identify completely with someo of your statements.

    As mentioned above - I really enjoyed BlogSq when you began to question the phenomena - that is when you grew in thinking about the phenomena IMO. The logic of breeding populations was simply too much for me years ago.

    Now, for a small slap on the hand. Deleting great mind works is NOT cool - and you definitely were cooking near the end with your insights. I would have wished for thoise to remain available for the next dbDonlan.

    All that said, I was enriched by reading the words in the final days of the blog - and thank you very much for that.

    OH, DAPHT, is also EXCELLENT.

    Rick Phillips

    ReplyDelete
  16. "From ghoulies and ghosties
    and long-legged beasties,
    and things that go bump in the night,
    Good Lord deliver us."

    ReplyDelete
  17. Well,I always enjoyed your column and enjoyed our 2 hour talk on the phone before I was a guest on Sasquatch Watch radio.
    However,the creature that I witnessed was not paranormal in any stretch of the imagination. It was a flesh and blood creature that possessed speed and strength that we humans can only dream of.
    The being that I watched go through a briar thicket in a few short seconds,a thicket so dense that it would take several men with machete's 20 minutes to chop through,was not a paranormal being,just a creature so adept at living in nature that it just seemed to blend and vanish and that is where I think some mistake those talents as being "paranormal".
    I always try to be open minded and to respect others opinions,however I feel that when we try to explain a mystery with another mystery we are doing a disservice to ourselves and the research in general.
    I miss your blog as it was always interesting and very enjoyable to read. Though I do not buy into the paranormal aspect at all and feel that it really does add to the perception that we are all "kooks",I try to respect the opinions of others without being combative.
    I have had several lengthy arguments with the paranormal crowd and neither side really wins. They are convinced that these creatures travel through wormholes to other dimensions,are telepathic,are capable of becoming invisible etc. and I am convinced that none of that is true and that these beings are simply using skills that we(humans)used to possess but have lost over the years.
    Technology has allowed us to become lazy and out of touch with nature,thus these creatures seem to have "abilities" that seem paranormal to some but are,in reality,just at one with their surroundings and using skills developed from living in nature without technology to do everything for them.
    If you returned to your blog I would still be a regular reader as you are a very talented writer and your blog was one of the best in the field. No matter what path you take I hope it leads you back to research because I think you have the brains and charisma that could only add to our community. Take care and enjoy life bro.

    ReplyDelete